[CWB] [CQPweb] dockerized version

Hardie, Andrew a.hardie at lancaster.ac.uk
Thu Jul 11 14:31:43 CEST 2019


Indeed. My general presumption had been that easy-install procedures are mainly for GUI-only people who *don't* want to use the command line (if they aren't techy enough to install from scratch the old-fashioned way, they aren't techy enough to do clever CL stuff with the Perl interface). But if that's *not* the case, and an easy-install is to support " a fairly complete working environment for CWB " use on the CL, then definitely yes, there's no reason to leave out the CWB-Perl.

Perhaps your VM setup for experts should be called CwbInABox!

Andrew. 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: cwb-bounces at sslmit.unibo.it <cwb-bounces at sslmit.unibo.it> On Behalf Of Stefan Evert
Sent: 11 July 2019 10:54
To: CWBdev Mailing List <cwb at sslmit.unibo.it>
Subject: Re: [CWB] [CQPweb] dockerized version


> On 10 Jul 2019, at 14:52, Hardie, Andrew <a.hardie at lancaster.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
> 1)   It does indeed get rid of the cwb-perl utility scripts. (https://sourceforge.net/p/cwb/code/HEAD/tree/perl/trunk/CWB/script/ )

So if the docker image is purely for people who use CQPweb and install corpora via the Web UI, you no longer need the Perl modules.  But it would be nice to provide them in case someone wants to do command-line work.

Same reasoning as for my version of the CQPwebInABox VM: this is an opportunity to provide a fairly complete working environment for CWB, not just a standalone CQPweb server.

Best,
Stefan
_______________________________________________
CWB mailing list
CWB at sslmit.unibo.it
http://liste.sslmit.unibo.it/mailman/listinfo/cwb


More information about the CWB mailing list