[CWB] Bug still present in cqpweb 3.2.42 Re: Date created Bug in cqpwev 3.2.40, already fixed?

[Jörg Knappen]

Thanks a lot, Andrew,

this was indeed the place where it happens. For strange reasons in my 
two installations (test and production, with slightly different update 
histories) the default values were switched. I have them fixed now.

Jörg Knappen

Am 2020-06-25 20:25, schrieb Hardie, Andrew:
> Puzzling, I can't reproduce this ( I still have one box running 3.2.42
> rather than 3.3! ). Creating a user by either "self-service" or
> through the admin tool produces the right "date created".
> 
> Could you run "describe user_info" in mysql?
> 
> The result lines for the two date fields should look like this:
> 
> +---------------------------+-------------------------+------+-----+---------------------+----------------+
> | Field                     | Type                    | Null | Key |
> Default             | Extra          |
> +---------------------------+-------------------------+------+-----+---------------------+----------------+
> (snip)
> | last_seen_time            | timestamp               | NO   |     |
> 1970-01-01 01:00:01 |                |
> | acct_create_time          | timestamp               | NO   |     |
> current_timestamp() |                |
> (snip)
> 
> If those lines don't look exactly like that, it would explain your 
> issue!
> 
> best
> 
> Andrew.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cwb-bounces at sslmit.unibo.it <cwb-bounces at sslmit.unibo.it> On
> Behalf Of Jörg Knappen
> Sent: 25 June 2020 15:32
> To: Open source development of the Corpus WorkBench 
> <cwb at sslmit.unibo.it>
> Subject: [CWB] Bug still present in cqpweb 3.2.42 Re: Date created Bug
> in cqpwev 3.2.40, already fixed?
> 
> 
> I just verified that this bug is still there in version 3.2.42.
> 
> Jörg Knappen
> 
> Am 2020-05-18 14:07, schrieb Jörg Knappen:
>> I noticed that all new users to our cqpweb have "date created" as
>> "1970-01-01". We are currently running cqpweb 3.2.40. Before I rush to
>> update: Is this one already known and fixed?
>> 
>> Greetings from my Saarbrücken Home Office,
>> 
>> Jörg Knappen
>> _______________________________________________
>> CWB mailing list
>> CWB at sslmit.unibo.it
>> https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fliste
>> .sslmit.unibo.it%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcwb&amp;data=02%7C01%7Ca.hardi
>> e%40lancaster.ac.uk%7C6a037bd68d624e41073408d819157d9a%7C9c9bcd11977a4
>> e9ca9a0bc734090164a%7C0%7C1%7C637286927389354048&amp;sdata=wuVCvfW24RN
>> syXRw7eLmNptbJBttBwg4M3LPcYI16rg%3D&amp;reserved=0
> _______________________________________________
> CWB mailing list
> CWB at sslmit.unibo.it
> https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fliste.sslmit.unibo.it%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcwb&amp;data=02%7C01%7Ca.hardie%40lancaster.ac.uk%7C6a037bd68d624e41073408d819157d9a%7C9c9bcd11977a4e9ca9a0bc734090164a%7C0%7C1%7C637286927389354048&amp;sdata=wuVCvfW24RNsyXRw7eLmNptbJBttBwg4M3LPcYI16rg%3D&amp;reserved=0
> _______________________________________________
> CWB mailing list
> CWB at sslmit.unibo.it
> http://liste.sslmit.unibo.it/mailman/listinfo/cwb